Zacks Premium
 
  
Home / Market Commentary / Traffic management and offload - dive...
 
 
-
 

Traffic management and offload - diverging solutions

  by Dean Bubley from Disruptive Analysis | February 3, 2010, 2:09 am
 
|
 
.
 
One of the major trends I'm seeing at the moment is that of mobile network offload - typically "dumping" traffic onto WiFi or other networks to avoid congestion from mobile broadband.

I'm expecting it to be a huge feature of this year's MWC / 3GSM in Barcelona.

But at first sight the offload trend seems to be a confusing mish-mash of technologies and techniques, all designed to reduce the impact of bulk traffic on cellular networks, but applied in very different ways. I'm trying to start to categorise these various areas, and also work out how they are being prioritised.

One important fact to note is that "congestion" is itself quite complex. It can be congested radio (RAN) networks in terms of downlink capacity, uplink capacity or signalling. It might be congestion in the backhaul from a cell-site to an aggregation point or the core network. It could be various elements of the core itself - SGSNs, GGSN and so forth. It could be a supporting IT system that handles IP networking (eg the DNS), or the billing/rating engine.

And then we have the various classes of solution. I'm still thinking about a full taxonomy (and terminology), but an initial starting point might be:

- Macro offload onto femtocells (in homes, offices, hotspots or outdoors)
- Macro offload onto WiFi (in homes, offices, hotspots or outdoors)
- Local IP breakout for WiFi & femtos (in the premise or at the broadband DSLAM / cable head-end)
- Managed offload (eg where the fixed or cable access provider, used for the WiFi or femto connection, actively assists in the offload process)
- Macro backhaul offload (eg direct connection to a cache or CDN for "bulk" Internet video)
- Core network offload / bypass
- Content compression (eg video format transcoding)
- Traffic-shaping (eg selectively degrading / capping specific flows or traffic types - sometimes misnamed as "applications")
- Policy control (prioritising specific users / subscribers, or administering specific profiles to some)
- Optimisation of capacity utilisation at the IP level, by changing the TCP protocol or packet scheduling, or by introducing "scavenger class" traffic

I'm sure there are others - while these segments can undoubtedly be fine-grained more as well. The bottom line revolves around a reduction or delay in the need for capex to enhance network capacity, and as a corollary an improvement in the more nebulous quality of "user experience" - at least for the bandwidth non-hogs.

What's not clear to me is which of these techniques is the most effective or important overall. I suspect it probably varies by operator, maybe even by cell or time. From a top-level ROI perspective, which of them enables spending on network upgrades to be minimised? Or perhaps introduces new revenue streams.

My gut feel is that for networks dominated by *PC-based* mobile broadband, the best option is some form of radio offload. All notebooks have WiFi, and they also tend to have the most complex applications and mashups, as well as being able to spot any degradation of quality or operator "interference" most readily. Having a PC user say "hang on - why's this video performing better over my ADSL line than over my HSDPA, what's going on?" is likely to lead to damaging PR, if you're trying to present your mobile broadband as a direct replacement for fixed connectivity.

I reckon it's simpler and safer just to dump PC traffic to a standard Internet connection as close to the device as possible. For iPhones and some smartphones, the same may be true. But for other devices, it may make more sense to route the traffic via the operator core and play around with subscriber policies, or adapt traffic at the application layer. But I'm sure there are exceptions in both cases - for example, where a PC is actually an operator-controlled netbook.

I'm going to try and resolve the picture more clearly over coming months.

About Dean Bubley
www.disruptivewireless.blogspot.com
Dean Bubley is the Founder of Disruptive Analysis, an independent technology industry analyst and consulting firm. An analyst with over 17 years’ experience, he primarily specialises in wireless, mobile, and telecoms fields.

Recent Articles:

     WiFi offload will not always win out over femtoc... - Mar 17, 2010
     The right way to sell mobile broadband.... - Mar 12, 2010
      You can't use my eyeballs for free - Mar 8, 2010
     Will MIMO work indoors? - Mar 5, 2010
     Netbooks - a skewed view on mobile broadband - Mar 5, 2010
     CTIA.... - Mar 3, 2010

Comments
   
Join our community to add your comment.

 
 
 
 
 
 Lookup Symbol
 
 
 
 
 
 
affiliate progam
   
Random Market Definition

Greed And Fear
Greed and fear are supposed, together with imitation, to be the three main motivators of stock markets and business behavior, and one of the cause of bull markets, bear markets and business cycles.

Zantrio on Twitter Zantrio on Facebook Market Commentary by RSS Market Commentary by Email
 
 
Market Tools

Economic Calendar

Commentary

Dictionary

Free Stock Picks

Premium Services

- Home

- Login

- Open a Free Account

- Contact Us

- Affiliate Program

- Legal

- Investing

Copyright 2010 - Zantrio Trading, LLC - All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer and Legal Stuff

Stocks Trading, Futures Trading and/or Forex trading involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors.

Any style of trading in any market is extremely risky and can result in substantial financial losses in a very short period of time. There is considerable exposure to risk in any Stocks, Futures or Forex transaction including but not limited to, the potential for changing political and/or economic conditions that may substantially affect the price or liquidity of a trade.

Trading Stocks, Futures or Forex is a challenging and potentially profitable opportunity for educated and experienced investors. Before deciding to participate in the Stocks, Futures or Forex market, you should carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience and risk appetite. Most importantly, do not invest money you cannot afford to lose. Investment Objective, experience, risk of loss, leverage, creditworthiness, limited regulatory protection, market volatility that may substantially affect the price or liquidity of a Stocks, Futures or Forex trade, communication failure, etc. could put you at risk for the loss of some or all of your capital and/or assets. The possibility exists that you could sustain a total loss of initial margin funds and be required to deposit additional funds to maintain your position.

For more information on risks associated with day trading, please visit the SEC website, http://www.sec.gov/answers/daytrading.htm.

Information and data is provided for informational purposes only. By accessing Zantrio.com which is owned by Zantrio Trading, LLC, you agree not to redistribute the information found herein. Zantrio.com which is owned by Zantrio Trading, LLC nor any data or content providers you utilize on this website shall be liable for any errors or for any actions taken in reliance thereof. Zantrio.com which is owned by Zantrio Trading, LLC, is not a registered broker-dealer but, may provide customized links to specified independent companies for your convenience only. The specified independent companies you select are solely responsible for their services to you, their customer. The services you access through various links or banners located on this website, are services of specified independent companies. Zantrio.com which is owned by Zantrio Trading, LLC, cannot be liable for any damages or costs of any type arising out of or in any way connected with your use of the services of any specific independent companies.